Slip and Fall Causation: Proving the Connection
In this instructive episode of P.I. Case Note, we analyse the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision in Gomez v Woolworths Group Limited [2024] NSWCA 121, which examines the critical element of factual causation in slip and fall cases under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). The case demonstrates the challenges plaintiffs face in proving that a defendant’s breach of duty actually caused their fall and injuries.
The court’s analysis provides valuable insights into how causation must be established through evidence rather than assumption. This decision highlights that even when a hazard exists and a fall occurs, plaintiffs must still prove the causal connection between the specific breach and their injuries. The judgment serves as an important reminder about the evidentiary requirements in premises liability cases.
Listen for our detailed examination of this causation-focused decision. If you’ve been injured in a slip and fall accident at a retail premises, proving causation is crucial to your claim’s success. Contact accident legal for a free consultation to ensure your case has the evidence needed to establish this vital connection.