Mining Camp Injury: Liability, Credit, and Quantum Complexities
In this comprehensive episode of P.I. Case Note, we analyse the Queensland Supreme Court decision in Carey-Schofield v Hays & Civeo [2024] QSC 60, which demonstrates the complexities of workplace injury claims involving multiple defendants. The case examines liability apportionment between employers and accommodation providers under both the Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) and common law principles.
The court’s detailed analysis addresses crucial issues, including credibility assessments, liability apportionment between multiple defendants, and quantum calculations for serious workplace injuries. This decision provides valuable insights into how courts handle cases where workplace injuries occur in employer-provided accommodation, particularly in remote mining operations. The judgment emphasises the importance of credibility in establishing both liability and the extent of injuries, while also demonstrating how damages are calculated when multiple parties share responsibility.
Listen for our thorough examination of this multi-defendant workplace injury case. If you’ve been injured at a mining site or work camp, determining all liable parties is essential to maximising compensation. Contact accident legal for a free consultation—our experienced team knows how to pursue claims against multiple defendants and navigate the complex interplay between workers’ compensation and common law rights.
